Supreme Court Enters Climate Litigation Fray, Weighing State vs. Federal Jurisdiction in Landmark Energy Company Cases
The Supreme Court is stepping into a growing wave of climate change litigation, agreeing to hear cases that will decide whether lawsuits against energy companies should be heard in state or federal courts. Local governments from Boulder to Baltimore are suing fossil fuel companies, alleging they knowingly contributed to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions. The energy companies argue these cases belong in federal court, while municipalities want them in state courts where they might find more favorable rulings. The legal battle centers on whether climate damages claims constitute federal questions or state law issues like public nuisance. The Court's decision could either open floodgates for more climate lawsuits or effectively end them by moving them to federal jurisdiction. This comes as climate litigation is increasing globally, with courts worldwide grappling with how to assign responsibility for climate impacts. Several cases are before the Court, including ones involving ExxonMobil, Suncor Energy, and other major fossil fuel companies. The outcomes could redefine how companies are held accountable for environmental impacts and set precedents for future climate-related litigation. Legal experts suggest this could be one of the most significant environmental law decisions in decades.
Prefer swipe-first reading?
Install the app to keep reading with faster loads and a smoother mobile experience.
Sources
Climate change plaintiffs now claim that greenhouse gases are causing property damage through fire, flood, and frost, ignoring the role of Mother Nature. Creative attorneys are repackaging these natural catastrophes as the consequence of the “nefarious” activities of alleged greenhouse ...
Supreme Court agrees to hear arguments from oil and gas companies trying to block climate change lawsuits | PBS News
President Donald Trump's administration ... to global climate change." Trump, a Republican, criticized the lawsuits in an executive order, and the Justice Department has sought to head some off in court. Attorneys for Boulder had agued that the litigation is still in early stages ...
Supreme Court steps into wave of local climate lawsuits | Columnists | chronicleonline.com
In the 2011 case American Electric ... greenhouse gas emissions. The high court was widely expected to revisit the broader question, though the timing remained uncertain. The justices previously declined to intervene in similar cases on procedural grounds, including rejecting review of a Hawaii Supreme Court ruling last year. The decision could determine whether climate lawsuits remain in ...
Creative attorneys are repackaging ... alleged greenhouse gas polluters, such as oil and gas companies. Whether these cases will be allowed to be brought in state court before sympathetic juries is now a question posed to the Supreme Court. ... Just about every major law school is incorporating climate change lawsuits in its ...
Supreme Court to weigh bid by energy companies to end state-court climate change suits - CBS News
Boulder officials alleged in their lawsuit that the "unchecked production, promotion, refining, marketing and sale of fossil fuels" around the world led to "unchecked fossil fuel use" and an increased concentration of greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere, which has then warmed the planet.
SCOTUS will consider whether cities, states can sue oil firms over climate damage | Bond Buyer
Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners ... greenhouse-gas emissions on the global climate." They also asked parties to consider whether the court has the power to hear the case at all. The city and county of Boulder, Colo. in 2018 sued Exxon Mobil and Canadian-based Suncor Energy, arguing the companies knowingly contributed to global climate change and causing millions of dollars of local damage. The Colorado Supreme Court last May ruled that the lawsuit could ...
Boulder’s lawsuit argues that the companies violated state laws like public nuisance, trespass and conspiracy, among others, and should help communities pay to adapt and recover from increasingly devastating and expensive climate disasters.
The Supreme Court will review whether ... alleged climate change damages. On Feb. 23, the court granted certiorari to review a Colorado Supreme Court ruling in Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County. The court will specifically examine whether the federal Clean Air Act preempts state-law nuisance claims seeking damages from oil and gas companies. Justices are expected to examine a Colorado ruling allowing a lawsuit against ExxonMobil ...
Fact Checks
Related news
Accountability Debates: Funding, Legal Obstacles, and Historical Knowledge on Climate Change
Federal funding for the oil and gas industry has reportedly broken commitments to phase out fossil fuels, sparking debate over corporate accountability for the climate crisis. Reports indicate that major emitting countries and governments had knowledge of the dangers posed by fossil fuels for decades, sometimes since the 1960s. This historical knowledge contrasts with current claims and suggests governments ignored legal obligations to prevent climate harm, while industry lawyers have also been accused of obstructing climate accountability in court.
Colorado Climate Extremes Signal New Reality for Water Management and Disease Risk
Extreme weather events, including prolonged droughts, wildfires, and heavy flooding, have arrived in Colorado, signaling that climate disaster is no longer a distant threat but a current reality. Research is examining how these shifts may reshape disease risk, while extreme snow droughts are proving that severe water shortages will become the norm for the Western United States. This climate instability is directly impacting critical water resources, particularly the Colorado River. As negotiations intensify over the river's future, federal officials are planning interventions, potentially imposing large cuts to water usage across seven states. Experts suggest that the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation should reconsider its management approach amid these climate pressures and legal disputes.
Indonesia Urges Climate Cooperation with Timor-Leste
Former Indonesian President Megawati Soekarnoputri has called for enhanced bilateral relations and joint cooperation with Timor-Leste to address climate challenges. This diplomatic push aligns with global concerns, as extreme weather events like heatwaves and droughts pose severe threats to children worldwide. According to UNICEF reports, nearly one in two children are exposed to multiple climate risks simultaneously, highlighting the urgent need for coordinated international action.
Climate Change Reshapes California Wine Map and Viticulture
Climate change is fundamentally reshaping the geography of California's wine production, with researchers noting that shifting climatic conditions and escalating wildfire risks are making certain regions less viable for traditional viticulture. This environmental pressure is causing a potential flip in the wine map, with established areas like Napa and Sonoma facing challenges while coastal regions potentially surge. To cope, the industry is exploring adaptation strategies. Winemakers are testing heat-tolerant grape varieties, such as Mourvèdre, and the broader viticulture sector is seeking resilience. Lessons from other regions, like Mexico's climate-resilient wine industry, are also being studied as models for dealing with global climate challenges.
States and groups challenge EPA rollbacks of super pollutant regulations
The Trump administration announced a loosening of rules that would have restricted the use of super-polluting greenhouse gases in commercial refrigeration, aiming to lower costs. This included rolling back deadlines for businesses, such as supermarkets, allowing them more time—extending limits until 2032—to transition to less-polluting equipment. Environmental groups and state governments have responded by challenging these regulatory changes. California sued the administration for ignoring climate-changing fridge chemicals, while organizations like Bonta have fought the EPA's attempts to weaken 'super pollutant' regulations. Furthermore, New York Attorney General Letitia James and a coalition of attorneys general have joined lawsuits to challenge the federal government's rollback of…
Rising Climate Costs Force Changes in Business Strategy and Risk Assessment
Rising climate costs are fundamentally altering how companies approach business strategy and investment decisions. This shift is driven by the tangible financial impact of climate change, pushing organizations to reassess operational models and long-term planning. Business leaders acknowledge that sustainability can be a source of competitiveness, yet they remain concerned about the risks associated with a 'disorderly climate transition'. Furthermore, mandatory sustainability reporting standards are adding another layer of cost and complexity for organizations, highlighting that the scope of the climate challenge extends beyond simple emissions.
Take Yomuyo with you
Download the mobile app for personalized headlines and quick access to breaking stories.